🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed new appeals had come from mediators to restart negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations used their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks resume.

Trump recently said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently attempted to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the final answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a answer in the identical tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this invasion."