🔗 Share this article Relatives' Heartache Regarding Coastal Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family. An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades. A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward. “At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.” Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard. “It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.” “I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Soldier's Grave in Peril Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved. “It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.” She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.” Seeking Answers and Clarity The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious. Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near. “It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.” A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.” He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.” “There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.” The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.